22.04.2014

AR and ALM: Two Harbors in the Television of Independent Armenia

 
Today when, with the dissemination and access of the Internet, television as means of obtaining information is gradually yielding its dominant position and turning into a means of entertainment and leisure, it's worth retrospectively examining the path taken by post-Soviet Armenian television, pointing out the main stops on this path.  

The biggest change in Armenian television is tied with ALM TV — the channel that kept different layers of the Armenian viewing public glued to their screens for 10 years. It wouldn't be an exaggeration if we said that the history of independent Armenia's television is divided into two parts: before ALM and after ALM.


 

AR or the Tenderness of Irony


Before ALM TV, Armenia had television that tried to overcome the legacy of Soviet television, but still had numerous strings attached to it. Conditioned by the free market, democratic pluralism and anti-ideologization, a new situation was created in which many of the former functions of Soviet television became anachronistic, though they continued to be applied in whole or in part. Television caught between the inevitable processes of nationalization and commercialization was trying to free itself from ideological propaganda and educational functions. The nationalization process assumed that television production should satisfy the demands of different and as many as possible social strata, while commercialization assumed that the production of television was according to market demands. However, high culture continued to dominate the airwaves, which couldn't have a large audience — neither then nor now. At the same time, the airwaves were completely closed to the "rabiz" subculture, which had no small number of followers. That is, taste was being dictated directly, as in Soviet times. The educational function wasn't overcome, but television was more open and penetrating the airwaves were elements considered marginal in the Soviet era, such as, for example, pornography and the avant-garde. 

The quintessential of post-Soviet Armenian television was the AR TV station of the 90s — we could look at the main trends of the time using it as an example. AR was an example of an elite TV company, no matter how absurd that sounds when it comes to television. Art films, broadcasts with original content, a significant portion of which might be shown not only on television, but also in theaters, as a form of conceptual art. Working at AR was the Soviet Armenian underground, the dissidents, who had been waiting decades for this historical moment to propagate their ideas. They weren't TV professionals; they were painters, writers, thinkers. The main thing in AR TV's programming was the creative approach, originality, uniqueness. The emotional backdrop was the tender irony, the intellectual irony toward mass culture in which it operated, perhaps not fully realizing the nature of this culture but presuming that ideology no longer works and citing another instance of truth above ideology. 

Thanks to AR TV, that which generally contradicted the essence of TV took place in television — as a cradle of mass culture. That culture which is sheltered in the marginal space, which is the monopoly of the marginalized minority, through the television funnel became the property of the broadest masses of people. 

This was due to the fact that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the dissident intellectual elite, which dictated its tastes to the public via television, came to power. Using the pendulum principle, this elite government was quickly replaced by a militarized, criminal element, which, in turn, brought to television its subculture and its tastes, continuing to oblige the public in a direct manner. Basically not much changed: one marginal phenomenon came and replaced another marginal phenomenon. The idea of public television, which was to serve the demands of all social strata, remained unfulfilled. The closest anything came to this realization was not National Television, renamed Public Television and funded by the state budget, but the privately owned ALM TV station. But ALM did this through a truly alternative route. 


ALM or the Procession of Cynicism

ALM's name, the acronym of which in Armenian means Alternative News Media, already suggests that ALM was conceived as an alternative to the type of television prevalent in Armenia, the ideal example of which was the TV station AR. The founders intended to provide an "alternative" on the political level, but the alternative ALM proposed to the public was chiefly cultural. ALM's "cultural revolution" refered to the castling and merging of high and low culture, to the processes of eliminating absolute taste which took place as a result of the domination of mass culture and within that culture.
Until the mid-20th century mass culture was classified as low culture and was subject to criticism by European intellectuals, despite having the status of an official culture in the US. And though the USSR criticized it for bourgeoisification and hedonism, it had its version of the same. Since the mid-20th century, the attitude toward mass culture has been changing, becoming tolerant and more inclined toward analysis than criticism. This pertains to the Western world which was entering the post-modern era. In addition to eliminating the contrast between high and low culture, post-modernism also extracted mass culture from that contrast. In the face of mass culture, we are now dealing with a new type of culture, which opposes neither elite nor national nor urban cultures. Here, the elite and the national (that which belongs to the people), the high and the low intersect and peacefully co-exist. This democratization of taste is a process that guides the democratization of society (it's no coincidence that this happened in Armenia only after the collapse of the Soviet Union). In art, the problem of nationalization arises, which is overcome through the multi-layeredness of creation: through an abundance of illusions, references and links — post-modern work is for the intellectual, informed "consumer" but it doesn't pressure the uninformed through learnedness. Everyone gets according to what he knows and no one feels degraded. 

The ALM alternative was created for the imaginary "ignoramus" but it was watched and understood also by intellectuals — not feeling themselves to be belittled. That is, ALM even approached nationalization, but not how it was done in television (by breaking up airtime and offering different programs for different segments of society), but how it was done by an individual creator — ensuring multi-layeredness in every broadcast. This is not surprising as ALM was not a collective of professionals, but rather an amateur, person-driven TV company.

Of course, television doesn't exist outside of mass culture; our everyday life is generally within mass culture, and television is not the part of our life that can slip out of that culture. However, like AR, ALM also operated contrary to the patterns of mass culture. Mass culture is anonymous, but creative thinking with a copyright stamp was present here. Amateurism and improvisation have no place in mass culture — this is the work of a collective of professionals having a narrow specialization. There were no professionals at ALM; everyone — from the broadcaster to the political figure (who were basically the same person) — were amateurs. The mass culture product is commercial, but ALM's wasn't commercial — it could be sold only to the author (the audio recording of a song to the singer, the video of a political broadcast to the political figure invited as a guest, and so on). 
One of the most important functions of mass culture is acculturation, whereby the individual accommodates to the given cultural situation. The mechanism of acculturation works like the mechanism of general education, but the mass culture is presented as a culture of entertainment and seemingly refuses to shoulder educational responsibility. It "educates" without educating, by averaging the knowledge circulating in different segments of society. ALM founder and director Tigran Karapetyan (pictured) was the first television figure who had the courage to straightforwardly declare that it was not television's mission to educate. It was the awareness of this reality that spurred the rapid commercialization of Armenian television.

AR and ALM were the path that Soviet television was to have passed to become the channel of mass culture. It's no coincidence that AR and ALM existed not simultaneously, but replacing each other as one the reaction of the other. If AR was ironic, ALM assumed the positions of cynicism. It denied the existence of any "upper level" and leaned on the lower levels. If the value system collapses, it is one of the paths to orientation.

Parallel to ALM, Armenian television began to change and assume the appearance that it has today. It became the indifferent transmitter of Armenian mass culture, as television is destined to be in the modern world.

Arpi Voskanyan
Translated from Armenian by media.am


 

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий

ասա, մեջդ մի պահիր